Battery on Peace Officer

Practice Areas

How can an aggressive Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer defend a charge of battery on a police officer?

Defending a charge of battery on a police officer can be challenging, but an aggressive Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer may employ several strategies to defend their client, such as:

  1. Challenging the evidence: The lawyer may challenge the evidence presented by the prosecution, such as eyewitness testimony or video footage, by arguing that the police officer provoked the altercation or that their client’s actions did not constitute battery.
  2. Questioning the police officer’s credibility: The lawyer may try to discredit the police officer’s testimony by questioning their conduct during the incident, their history of disciplinary actions or complaints, or any potential biases or prejudices they may hold.
  3. Asserting self-defense or defense of others: The lawyer may argue that their client acted in self-defense or defense of others if the police officer used excessive force or if their client was trying to protect someone else from harm.
  4. Seeking a plea bargain: If the evidence against their client is strong, the lawyer may negotiate a plea bargain with the prosecution to reduce the charges or sentencing.
  5. Filing a motion to suppress evidence: The lawyer may file a motion to suppress evidence if they believe the police officer violated their client’s constitutional rights during the arrest or search, such as conducting an illegal search or using excessive force.

It’s important to note that every case is different, and the strategies used by a criminal defense lawyer will depend on the specific circumstances of the case. An aggressive Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer may choose to use a combination of these strategies or employ other tactics to defend their client.

 

Free Consultation – CALL NOW 

 

How does California law define the crime of battery on a peace officer?

Under California Penal Code 243(b), when a battery is committed against the person of a peace officer, custodial officer, firefighter, emergency medical technician, lifeguard, security officer, custody assistant, process server, traffic officer, code enforcement officer, animal control officer, or search and rescue member engaged in the performance of his or her duties, whether on or off duty, including when the peace officer is in a police uniform and is concurrently performing the duties required of him or her as a peace officer while also employed in a private capacity as a part-time or casual private security guard or patrolman, or a nonsworn employee of a probation department engaged in the performance of his or her duties, whether on or off duty, or a physician or nurse engaged in rendering emergency medical care outside a hospital, clinic, or other health care facility, and the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a peace officer, custodial officer, firefighter, emergency medical technician, lifeguard, security officer, custody assistant, process server, traffic officer, code enforcement officer, animal control officer, or search and rescue member engaged in the performance of his or her duties, nonsworn employee of a probation department, or a physician or nurse engaged in rendering emergency medical care, the battery is punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

Under California Penal Code 243(c) (1), when a battery is committed against a custodial officer, firefighter, emergency medical technician, lifeguard, process server, traffic officer, or animal control officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, whether on or off duty, or a nonsworn employee of a probation department engaged in the performance of his or her duties, whether on or off duty, or a physician or nurse engaged in rendering emergency medical care outside a hospital, clinic, or other health care facility, and the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a nonsworn employee of a probation department, custodial officer, firefighter, emergency medical technician, lifeguard, process server, traffic officer, or animal control officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, or a physician or nurse engaged in rendering emergency medical care, and an injury is inflicted on that victim, the battery is punishable by a fine of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000), by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for 16 months, or two or three years.

What are some defenses to battery against a peace officer?

In California, battery against a peace officer is a serious offense, and anyone facing such charges should seek the help of an experienced criminal defense attorney. Here are some defenses that an experienced California criminal attorney can assert in a battery against a peace officer case:

  1. Self-defense: If the defendant acted in self-defense, then they may be able to assert this defense against a charge of battery against a peace officer. This defense can be used if the officer used excessive force or if the defendant reasonably believed that they were in danger and needed to protect themselves.
  2. Defense of others: A defendant can also use the defense of others if they were trying to protect someone else from harm. This defense can be used if the defendant reasonably believed that the peace officer was using excessive force against someone else, and they needed to intervene to protect that person.
  3. Lack of intent: The defendant must have intended to commit the battery against the peace officer to be convicted of this offense. If the defendant did not have the intent to harm the peace officer, then they may be able to use this defense.
  4. False accusation: Sometimes, a peace officer may falsely accuse someone of battery. An experienced criminal defense attorney can investigate the circumstances of the arrest and identify any inconsistencies or discrepancies in the officer’s testimony to prove that the accusation is false.
  5. Excessive force: If the peace officer used excessive force during the arrest, then the defendant may be able to assert this as a defense against the charge of battery against a peace officer. An experienced criminal defense attorney can examine the police report, witness statements, and any available video footage to determine if the peace officer used excessive force.

These are just some of the defenses that an experienced California criminal attorney can assert in a battery against a peace officer case. The attorney will review the specific circumstances of the case and determine the best defense strategy for their client.

Free Consultation – CALL NOW 

Skip to content